Title: Self Ligating Bracket Vs Conventional Bracket
Authors: T.Nandhini, Dr Saravana Pandian
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v4i6.49
Abstract
Aim: This review article examines evidence regarding treatment duration, influence on arch form and the speed of tying and untying self ligating brackets compared with conventional bracket, methods of ligation and its advantage and disadvantage.
Objective: To evaluate the clinical differences in relation to the use of self ligating bracket in orthodontics.
Background: The self ligating bracket uses a slide mechanism to hold the arch wire, thus reducing the amount of pressure exerted on the teeth. However, there are many similarities to typical braces, such as the fitting on such appliances. Regular cleaning is also essential for effective treatment and desirable results.
Reason: The purpose of this review were to identify and review the orthodontic literature with regard to the efficiency, effectiveness, and stability of treatment with self ligating brackets compared with conventional brackets.
References
1. Chen S.S., Greenlee G.M., Kim J.E., Smith C.L., Huang G.J.: Systematic review of self-ligating brackets. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2010, 137, 726.e1–e18.
2. Rinchuse D.J., Miles P.G.: Self-ligating brackets: present and future. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2007, 132, 216–222.
3. Harradine N.: The history and development of self-ligating brackets. Semin. Orthod. 2008, 14, 5–18.
4. Berger, J. L. & Byloff, F. K. (2001). The clinical efficiency of self-ligated brackets. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 304–308, ISSN 1147-5540.
5. Damon, D.H. The Damon low-friction bracket: A biologically compatible straight-wire system. (1998). Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, Vol. 32, No. 11, pp. 670-680, ISSN 1038-8398.
6. Keim, R. G.; Gottlieb, E. L.; Nelson, A. H. & Vogels, D. S. (2008). Study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part 1: results and trends. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, Vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 625–640, ISSN 1907-5377.
7. keim, R. G.; Gottlieb, E. L.; Nelson, A. H. & Vogels, D. S. (2002). Study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part 1. Results and trends. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 553-568, ISSN 0168-0786.
8. Megat Abdul Wahab R., Idris H., Yacob H., Zainal Ariffin S.H.: Comparison of self- and conventional-li- gating brackets in the alignment stage. Eur. J. Orthod. 2011, Advance Access published April 8, 2011. [Epub ahead of print].
9. Pandis N., Eliades T., Partowi S., Bourauel C.: Forces exerted by conventional and self-ligating brackets during simulated first- and second-order corrections. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2008, 133, 738–742.
10. Rinchuse D.J., Miles P.G.: Self-ligating brackets: present and future. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2007, 132, 216–222.
11. Harradine N.W.T.: Self-ligating brackets: where are we now? J. Orthod. 2003, 30, 262–273.
12. Baccetti T., Franchi L., Camporesi M., Defraia E.: Orthodontic forces released by low-friction versus conven- tional systems during alignment of apically or buccally malposed teeth. Eur. J. Orthod. 2011, 33, 50–54.
13. Brauchli L.M., Senn C., Wichelhaus A.: Active and passive self-ligation – a myth? Angle Orthod. 2011, 81, 312–318.
14. Voudouris J.C.: Interactive edgewise mechanisms: form and function comparison with conventional edgewise brackets. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 1997, 111, 119–140.
15. Harradine N.W.: Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency. Clin. Orthod. Res. 2001, 4, 220–227.
16. Fleming P.S., DiBiase A.T., Sarri G., Lee R.T.: Efficiency of mandibular arch alignment with 2 preadjusted edge-wise appliances. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2009, 135, 597–602.
17. Fleming P.S., Johal A.: Self-ligating brackets in orthodontics. A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2010, 80,575–584.
18. Eberting J.J., Straja S.R., Tuncay O.C.: Treatment time, outcome, and patient satisfaction comparisons of Damon and conventional brackets. Clin. Orthod. Res. 2001, 4, 228–234.
19. Proffit W.R., Fields H.W. Jr, Sarver D.M.: Zasady mechaniki w kontroli sił ortodontycznych. In: Ortodoncja Współczesna. Wyd. IV. Tom II. Eds.: Komorowska A. Elsevier Urban & Partner, Wrocław, 2010, 31–66.
20. Miles P.G.: SmartClip versus conventional twin brackets for initial alignment: is there a difference? Aust. Orthod. J. 2005, 21, 123–127.
21. Ong E., McCallum H., Griffin M.P., Ho C.: Efficiency of self-ligating vs conventionally ligated brackets during initial alignment. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2010, 138, 138.e1–e7.
22. Pandis N., Polychronopoulou A., Eliades T.: Self-ligating vs. conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2007, 132, 208–215.
23. Fleming P.S., DiBiase A.T., Sarri G., Lee R.T.: Mandibular arch dimensional changes with 2 preadjusted edge-wise appliances. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2009, 136, 340–347.
24. ScottP.,DiBiaseA.T.,SherriffM.,CobourneM.:AlignmentefficiencyofDamon3self-ligatingandconventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2008, 134, 471–478.
25. Pandis N., Nasika M., Polychronopoulou A., Eliades T.: External apical root resorption in patients treated with conventional and self-ligating brackets. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2008, 134, 646–651.
26. Pellegrini P., Sauerwein R., Finlayson T., McLeod J., Covell D.A. Jr, Maier T., Machida C.A.: Plaque re- tention by selfligating vs elastomeric orthodontic brackets: quantitative comparison of oral bacteria and detection with adenosine triphosphate-driven bioluminescence. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2009, 135, 426.e1–e9.
27. Pandis N., Vlachopoulos K., Polychronopoulou A., Madianos P., Eliades T.: Periodontal condition of the mandibular anterior dentition in patients with conventional and self-ligating brackets. Orthod. Craniofac. Res.2008, 11, 211–215.
28. Fortini A., Lupoli M., Cacciafesta V.: A new low-friction ligation system. J. Clin. Orthod. 2005, 39, 464–471.
29. Papageorgiou; et al. (2014). "Clinical effects of pre-adjusted edgewise orthodontic brackets: a systematic review and meta-analysis.". Euro J orthod. 124 (4): 350–363. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjt064. PMID 24062378.