Title: Does choice of mechanical prosthetic valve affect change in left ventricular functions after aortic valve replacement
Authors: Hakeem Zubair Ashraf, Nadeem-ul-Nazeer, Abdul Gani Ahangar, Farooq A Ganie, Mohammad, Yaqoob Khan, Haroon Rashid Naqshi, Abdul Majeed Dar, Mohammad Akbar Bhat, Syed Mohsin, Peerzada Hidayat, Pradeep Kumar, Rouf Gul
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v8i6.04
Abstract
Background: We sought to determine whether the choice of mechanical prosthetic valve (Bileaflet or Monoleaflet) has any effect on change in left ventricular functions and valve gradients after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with pure aortic valve disease.
Methods: Eighty two patients were included in the study who underwent aortic valve replacement for isolated aortic valve disease using either a bileaflet (Group1) or a monoleaflet valve (Group 2). The measurements included Left Ventricular End-Diastolic (LVEDd) and Left Ventricular End-Systolic (LVEDs) dimensions and Left Ventricular End-Diastolic (LVEDV) and Left Ventricular End-Systolic (LVESV) volumes, Ejection Fraction (EF), Stroke Volume (SV), NYHA class and Cardiac Output (CO). Comparisons of different parameters were made in two groups to determine the significance of choice of prosthetic valve.
Results: Aortic valve replacement induces a favourable remodeling of the left ventricle and a significant improvement in left ventricular functions. There was no statistically significant difference in the measured parameters between the two groups and hence choice of prosthetic valve does not influence the outcome.
Conclusion: Impaired cardiac functions show significant improvement after AVR. Functional class was improved or maintained in all the patients in both the groups. Left ventricular systolic pump functions were improved in almost all the patients, comparable in both the groups.
References
- Smitty HG, Parker EF. Experimental aorticvalvotomy, preliminary Surg Gynaecol Obstet 1947; 34:625
- Miller GAH, Kirklin JW, Swan Myocardial function and left ventricular volumes in Acquired valvular insufficiency. Circulation 1965;31:374
- Kennedy JW, Doces J, Stewart Left ventricular function before and following aortic valve replacement. Circulation 1977;56:944
- Pela G, La Canna G, Metra Long term changes in left ventricular mass, chamber size and function after aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic Stenosis and depressed ejection fraction. Cardiology 1997;88 (4);315-22
- Tarasoutchi F, Filho JP, Cardoso LF, Protasio L, et al . Symptoms, left ventricular function and timing of valve replacement surgery in patients with aortic American Heart Journal 1999;138:477-85
- Skarvan K, Zuber M, Seeberger M, Stulz Immediate effects of aortic valve replacement on left ventricular function and its determinants. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 1999;16:659-68.
- Robert P, Roque Pifarre, Henry Reversal of advanced left ventricular dysfunction following aortic valve replacement for aortic Stenosis. The annals of Thoracic Surgery 1977; 24(1):38
- Martin JS, Plappert T, Speigel A, et al . Early postoperative changes in left ventricular chamber size, architecture and function in aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation and their relation to intraoperative changes in afterload: a prospective two dimensional echocardiographic study. Circulation 1987; 76(1):77-89 .
- Stephen J, Micheal V, Richard Cardiac shape and function in aortic valve disease: Physiologic and clinical implications. The American Journal of Cardiology 1977;39:170.
- Santinga JT, Kirsh MM, Brady TJ, Thrall J, pitt B. Radionuclide angiography in evaluation of left ventricular function following aortic valve replacement. The annals of Thoracic Surgery 1981;31(5): 409.
- Franz S, Willem F, Michael S et al. Impaired left ventricular function in chronic aortic valve disease: Survival and functios after replacement by Bjork- Shiley Prosthesis. Circulation 1979; 60(1): 48.
- Simon Jk, Mant H, Richard ER. Circulatory changes in severe aortic regurgitation before and after surgical correction. The American Journal of Cardiology 1971; 28: 442.
- Harpole DH, Jones RH. Serial assessment of ventricular performance after valve replacement for aorticstenosis. Jthorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990; 99: 645-50.
- James D, Edward A, Sudhakar R et al. Effect of preoperative ejection fraction on survival and haemodynamic improvement following aortic valve replacement. Circulation 1978; 58 (6): 175.
- Seppo L, Juha T, Matti R. Effect of aortic valve replacement on the leftventricle. Scand J Thor Cardiovasc Surgery 1979; 13:249-54.
- Clark DG, Mcnulty JH, Rahimatoola SH. Valve replacement in aortic insufficiency with LV dysfunction. Circulation 1980;61:411.