Title: Surgical AVR, Revisited

Authors: Dr Sistla VPL Chandrakumar, Dr Jhadav Niranjan Ulashrao, Dr Kunwar Sidharth Saurabh, Dr Aabha Divya, Dr Anubhav Gupta

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i12.39

Abstract

Introduction: Other aortic interventions are often compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), which is the current gold standard1. In view of the increasing interest in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), in our study we analysed the relevance of surgical AVR

Materials and Methods: We analysed 108 consecutive patients who underwent SAVR in a year at our institute in terms of demography, indications, surgical approach and complications. We searched the available literature for comparative studies between surgical and catheter based aortic valve replacement and the outcomes using the MeSH terms aortic valve replacement, TAVI, TAVR.

Results: Surgical AVR continues to be the gold standard in the management of aortic valve disease. TAVR is not entirely risk-free and has high incidence of paravalvular leak, risk of pacemaker implantation and vascular complications.

Conclusions: In low, intermediate as well as high-risk patients surgical AVR continue to be the gold standard of treatment.

Keywords: AVR, TAVI, TAVR, surgical AVR, MICS AVR.

Editorial Policy

Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not ..

Read More.....

Frequency of Publication

JMSCR is published as monthly journal with 12 issues per year. Special editions are also planned subjected to the scope and need....

Read more...

Submission of Articles

Authors are invited to submit their research articles, review papers, Case Report properly formatted as per the author guidelines.........

Read more...