Distal femoral fractures are difficult to manage because they are involved with extensive soft tissue injuries, comminution, and involvement of articular surface. There are several implants used to treat includes condylar buttress plate fixation, locking compression plate, dynamic condylar screw, and cancellous screws.

Methods: Kakatiya Medical College and MGM Hospital, Warangal. A total of n=25 patients were studied during the period of which in n=23patients mode of injury was due to road traffic accidents [RTA] and the remaining 2 cases are due to slip and fall. They there are n=23 compound fractures (80%) and among them, n=1 case belongs to type I, n=2 cases classified under type II and remaining are type III (80%). During follow up, those patients who visited the outpatient department once in every four weeks assessed fracture union clinically and radiologically and the range of motion of knee and power of quadriceps was also assessed. At the end of 12 weeks, partial weight-bearing was allowed with the help of axillary crutches or walker and full weight-bearing was allowed at the end of 4months after confirming the clinical and radiological union of the fracture.

Results: The majority of the study subjects n=20(80%) had Range of knee flexion up to 80 degrees of knee flexion range of movement. More than 80 degrees of motion was found in n=5(20%) of the subjects shown in table 6. Most n=11(44%) of the study population were found to have excellent NEER'S score followed by good n=9 (36%) and fair with n=3 (12%), failure n=2 (8%) NEERs score was found to be least in our study.

Conclusion: An analysis of results of the present study based on the type of fractures shows good results were seen with Muller's type B fractures than type C. The younger individuals aged less than 18-38 years had better functional outcome when compared to the elderly patients. Among the different implants used for fixation of fractures in the present study, CBP was found to be the best choice as compared to other implants.

Keywords: Intra Articular Fractures, Distal Femoral Fractures, Functional Outcome.

1. Areneson TJ, Melton LJ, Lewallen DG, et al. Epidemiology of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures in Rochester, Minnesota,1965-1984.Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;234:188-94.
2.  Martinet O, Cordey J, Harder Y, et al (2000). The epidemiology of fractures of the distal femur. Injury 2000; 31 Suppl 3: C62-63.
3. Walling AK, Seradge H, Speigel PG. Injuries to the knee ligaments with fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982; 64: 1324-27.
4. Muller, M.E.; Nazarian, S.; Koch, P. Classification AO des Fractures. Springer-Verlag New York,1987.
5. Neer CS II, Grantham SA, Shelton ML. Supracondylar Fracture of the. Adult Femur –A Study of One  Hundred and Ten Cases. JBJS Am1967 June; 49-A (4): 591-13.
6. Stewart MJ, Sisk TD, Wallace SL Jr. Fractures of the Distal Third of Femur – A Comparison of methods of treatment. JBJS Am 1966 June; 48-A(4): 784-80.
7. Schatzker J, Home G, Waddell J. The Toronto Experience with Supracondylar Fractures of Femur. Injury 1974 Nov; 6(2): 113-128.
8. Muller, M.E. Allgower, M.; Schneider, R. Willenegger, H. Manual of Internal Fixation, 3rd Ed. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1991.

9. Siliski JM, Mahring M and Hofer Hp Supracondylar-intercondylar fractures of the femur. Treatment by internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989; 71:95-104.
10. Healy WL, Brooker AF. Distal femoral fractures comparisons of open and closed methods of treatment. Clinical Orthopaedics and related research 1983; 174:200-206.
11. Tapi Nalo, Amit Agrahari, Snehasish Datta, Vinil Paul S, Nongthon Singh, Roel Langshong. Treatment of Supracondylar Fracture of Distal Femur with Condylar Locking Compression Plating, IJSR, 2015; 4(2):1468-70.
12. Abhijit Sarkar, Sachlang Debbarma, Santosh Rehang, Subal Debnath, JM Datta, S Naha. Outcome of Treatment of Distal Third Femur Fracture by Locking Compression Plate MIPPO Technique. Indian Journal of Applied Research.2016; 6(3): 271-74.
13. Weight M, Collinge C. Early results of the less invasive stabilization system for mechanically unstable fractures of the distal femur (AO/OTA types A2, A3, C2, and C3). J Orthop Trauma 2004;18(8): 503-508.
14. Krishna KR, Nayak B, Amrit G. Study of surgical management of distal femoral fractures by distal femoral locking compression plate osteosynthesis. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Surgery 2015; 1(1): 22-26.
15. Adnan L M, Mudassar S, Noman S N, Suhail NKN. Outcome of Locking Compression Plate in Supracondylar Fracture of Distal Femur by Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis. P J M H S 2015;9(1): 31-33.
16. Kregor PJ, Stannard JA, Zlowodzki M, Cole PA. Treatment of distal femur fractures using the less invasive stabilization system: surgical experience and early clinical results in 103 fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2004; (8): 509-20.

Dr Dodda Prasad Reddy

Lakshmi Narsimha Nursing Home, Nehru Centre, Mahabubabad, Warnagal-506101, Telangana state