Title: Diagnostic and Prognostic evaluation of meningioma by IHC markers- A study of 100 cases
Authors: Prof. Dr Shikha Ghanghoria, Dr Paresh Sodhiya, Dr Vijeta Niranjan, Dr Varsha Argal, Prof. Dr Arvind Ghanghoria
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i2.72
Abstract
Introduction: Meningioma it is basically a tumour originating from meninges as said by by Cushing in 1921. It is typically a benign and slow growing tumour which appears mostly in the late decades of life.
Aim: 1) To evaluate histological subtypes of meningioma according to WHO classification. 2)To evaluate various immunohistochemical markers in meningioma. 3) To evaluate proliferative markers (Ki-67 LI) and correlate it with various histological grades of meningioma.
Materials and Methods: We have studied 100 cases of meningioma over a period of 5 years. Menigioma was diagnosed on the basis of CT Scan, MRI and by histopathological examination, we have correlated it with age and sex distribution, histological type and WHO grading of tumour.IHC markers EMA, vimentin, Pan CK and S100 were applied and confirmation of diagnosis was done, Further the prognosis was evaluated with the help of Ki67.
Results: As per the results meningiomas are more common in females (60%), commonest age group of this tumor is found to be from forth to sixth decade of life.. The commonest histopathological type was meningotheliomatous meningioma. The 96% of the meningioma was WHO GRADE I tumour consist of meningotheliomatous meningioma. EMA was expressed by 94% of all meningiomas, Vimentin positivity seen in all cases of meningioma suggestive of mesenchymal origin, Cytokeratin AE1/AE3 was expressed in 4% of meningiomas and involved predominantly secretory meningiomas(80%). S-100 positivity was seen in 26% cases. Ki – 67 was positive in all the cases of anaplastic meningiomas.
Conclusion: Conclusion drawn show the mean age of meningioma is around 48 years with female preponderance, It does not corresponds with variants and grade of the tumor. Biological behavior of the tumor is studied through 2016 WHO grading system of CNS tumors. Along with the histomrophological features Immunohistochemistry markers i.e. EMA, VIMENTIN, & S-100 should be considered as the diagnostic tool for meningiomas
Keywords: Menigioma, WHO grade, IHC, Ki – 67/MIB-1 index.
References
- Statistical Report: Primary brain tumours in the United States, 1998- 2002. Publis. Tumour Registry of United States. 2005. Perry A, Louis DN, Scheithauer BW, Budka H, Deimling VA. Meningiomas.
- In: Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, editors. World Health Organization classification of the central nervous system. 2007:164-72.
- Rao S, Sadiya N, Doraiswami S, Prathiba D. Characterization of morphologically benign biologically aggressive meningiomas. Neurol India. 2009;57:744–48. [PubMed]
- Sushila Jaiswal in Meningiomas: Objective assessment of proliferative indices by immunohistochemistry and automated counting method
- Perry A, Louis DN, Budka H, et al. Meningioma. In: Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, eds. WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system, Fourth Edition revised. Lyon, France: IARC press 2016:232–45
- Mezmezian MB, Carassai MB, Dopazo V, et al. Immunohistochemical expression of progesterone receptors in nonmening-othelial central nervous system tumors. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2016; doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000318
- Ng J, Celebre A, Munoz DG, et al. Sox10 is superior to S100 in the diagnosis of meningioma. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2015;23: 215–9
- Agaimy A, Buslei R, Coras R, et al. Comparative study of soft tissue perineurioma and meningioma using a five-marker immunohistochemical panel. Histopathology 2014;65:60–70
- Langford LA, Cooksley CS, DeMonte F. Comparision of MIB-1 (Ki-67) antigen and bromodeoxyuridine proliferation indices in meningiomas. Hum Pathol. 1996;27:350–54. [PubMed]
- Habberstad AH, Gulati S, Torp SH. Evaluation of the proliferation markers Ki-67/MIB-1, mitosin,survivin, pHH3, and DNA topoisomerase IIαin human anaplastic astrocytomas – an immunohistochemical study. Diagn Pathol. 2011;6:43. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Ramesh Babu Telugu et al in Histopathological and Immunohisto-chemical Evaluation of Meningiomas with Reference to Proliferative Markers p53 and Ki-67
- Roser F, Samii M, Ostertag H, Bellinzona M. The Ki-67 proliferation antigen in meningiomas. Experiencein 600 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2004;146:37-44.
- Camille Boulagnon-Rombi et al in Immunohistochemical Approach to the Differential Diagnosis of Meningiomas and Their Mimics.