Details
Category: Volume 06 Issue 05 May 2018
Hits: 1212

Title: Assessment of the relative prevalence of different criteria of metabolic syndrome in a rural population of northern India

Authors: Gajraj Singh Yadav, R.C. Gupta, Manju Pande

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i5.56

Abstract

Background: Studies on metabolic syndrome (MS) in rural population are scanty.

Objective: To assess the relative prevalence of different criteria of MS in patients with MS in rural population.

Material and Methods: The material comprised adult patients with metabolic syndrome, residing in a rural area (N=279). The metabolic syndrome was defined as the presence of 3 or more of the following: elevated blood pressure (BP), low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) level, high fasting plasma triglyceride (FPTG) level, elevated fasting plasma sugar (FPS) level, and high waist circumference (WC).

Results: The most prevalent criterion of MS was low HDL (N= 238 or 85.3%). High fasting plasma sugar (N=237 or 84.95%) was the next, followed by high serum triglycerides (N=228 or 81.72%). High blood pressure (N=167 or 59.85%) and increased waist circumference (N=71 or 25.45%) were found to be the fourth and fifth commonest criteria respectively.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that the metabolic syndrome occurs in rural population and its leading criteria are low HDL followed by high fasting plasma sugar and high plasma triglyceride. Due to the rural lifestyle and environment, obesity is not a common feature of MS in rural population.

Keywords: Metabolic Syndrome (MS), Rural population.

References

  1. Mazidi M, Rezaie P, Kengne P A, Mobarhan G M, Ferns G A. Gut microbiome, and syndrome. Diabetes Metabolic Syndrome.2016; 10(2 Suppl 1):150-157.
  2. Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult treatment panel -III). Circulation. 2002;10(6):3143-3421.
  3. Steinberger J. Diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome in children. Current opinion in lipidology. 2003; 14(2):555-559.
  4. Trinder P. Determination of glucose in blood using glucose oxidase with an alternative oxygen acceptor. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry.1969; 6(2):24-30.
  5. Fletcher MJ. A colorimetric method for estimating serum triglycerides. Journal of Clinica Chimica Acta. 1968; 45(22):393-398.
  6. Abell LL, Levy BB, Brodie BB, Kebndall FE. A simplified method for the estimation of total cholesterol in serum. The Journal of Biological Chemistry.1952; 19(5):357-363.
  7. Prasad DS, Kabir Z, Dash A K, Das B C. Prevalence and risk factors for metabolic syndrome in Asian Indians: A community study from urban Eastern India. J Cardiovasc Dis Res. 2012; 3(3):204-211.
  8. Parikh RM, Joshi SR, Menon PS, Shah NS. Prevalence and pattern of diabetic dyslipidemia in Indian type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews. 2010;4 (1):10-12.
  9. Basit A, Shera A S. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Pakistan. Metab Syndr Relat Disord.2008;6:171–175.
  10. Punith K, Sara Rani M, Priyank S, Rashmi S. Reddy, Nandini D R,  Mala D. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in rural India-a disparity in definitions. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2011; 31(4):188–193.
  11. Deepa M, Farooq S, Datta M, Deepa R, Mohan V. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome using WHO, ATPIII and IDF definitions in Asian Indians: the Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study (CURES-34). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2007;23:127-134.
  12. Mahadik SR, Deo SS, Mehtalia SD. Increased prevalence of metabolic syndrome in non-obese Asian Indian-an urban-rural comparison. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2007; 5: 142–152.
  13. Qiao Q, DECODE Study Group. Comparison of different definitions of the metabolic syndrome in relation to cardiovascular mortality in European men and women. Diabetologia. 2006; 49: 2837–2846.
  14. Gyakobo M, Albert G B Amoah, De-Anne M M, Rachel C S. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in a rural population in Ghana. BMC Endocrine Disorders. 2012; 12(25):1-9.
  15. Oladapo OO, Salako L, Sodiq O, Shoyinka K, Adedapo K, Falase AO. A prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors among a rural Yoruba south-western Nigerian population: a population-based survey. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2010;21(1):26–31.
  16. Ford ES, Giles W H. A comparison of the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome using two proposed definitions. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26(3):575–581.
  17. Hollman G, Kristenson M. The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and its risk factors in a middle-aged Swedish population mainly a function of overweight? Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2008; 7(1):21–26.
  18. Csaszar A, Kekes E, Abel T, Papp R, Kiss I, Balogh S. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome estimated by International Diabetes Federation criteria in a Hungarian population. Blood Press. 2006; 15(2):101–106.
  19. Ko GT, Cockram CS, Chow CC, Yeung VT, Chan WB, So WY, et al. Metabolic syndrome by the international diabetes federation definition in Hong Kong Chinese. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2006; 73(1):58–64.

Corresponding Author

Gajraj Singh Yadav

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.