Title: Induction of Labour with Vaginal Misoprostol and Incidence of Cesarean Delivery for MSL

Authors: Dr Jyoti Bindal, Dr Smita Soni

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i3.216

Abstract

Aim: Induction of labour with low lose of misoprostol (25 mg) and detecting the incidence of cesarean delivery for MSL.

Design: Prospective randomized control trial conducted at Kamla Raja Hospital, GRMC, Gwalior from 01 Jan. 2017 to 30 June 2017.

Participants: 150 pregnant women requiring induction of labour.

Methods: The women were divided into two groups based on Bishop score as favourable and unfavourable cervix group, induction delivery interval,  number of misoprostol doses, incidence of meconium stained liquor, incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome and rate of cesarean section for fetal distress due to meconium stained liquor.

Results: Among the outcomes compared between unfavourable and favourable cervix groups induction delivery interval, number of misoprostol doses and incidence of meconium stained liquor and meconium aspiration syndrome was more in unfavourable cervix group and thereby increases the rate of cesarean delivery. Long induction delivery interval and higher number of misoprostol doses were associated with higher incidence of meconium stained liquor in primigravida with unfavourable cervix group.

Conclusion: Misoprostol is an effective priming and labour inducing agent. Though incidence of meconium stained liquor is higher in misoprostol induced labour among women with unfavourable cervix thereby increasing the rate of cesarean delivery for meconium stain liquor and increasing maternal as well as fetal morbidity and mortality.

References

  1. Maul H, Mackay L, Garfield RE. Cervical ripening: biochemical, molecular, and clinical considerations. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 49:551.
  2. Word RA, Li XH, Hnat M, Carrick K. Dynamics of cervical remodeling during pregnancy and parturition: mechanisms and current concepts. Semin Reprod Med 2007; 25:69.
  3. Timmons BC, Mahendroo M. Processes regulating cervical ripening differ from cervical dilation and postpartum repair: insights from gene expression studies. Reprod Sci 2007; 14:53.
  4. Goldberg AB, Wing DA. Induction of Labor: The Misoprostol Controversy. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2003;48(4).
  5. Allen R, O’Brien BM. Uses of Misoprostol in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Reviews in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009;2(3):159-168.
  6. Hofmeyr GJ, Gulmezoglu AM, Alfirevic Z. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Aug;106(8):798-803.
  7. Goldberg AB, Greenberg MB, Darney PD. Misoprostol and pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:38–47.
  8. Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003 CD000941.
  9. Mani IY, Ratnakumari V, Sravanthi CTS. Induction of labour with vaginal misoprostol and incidence of meconium stained liquor and fetal outcome. J. Evid. Based Med. Healthc. 2016; 3(7), 221-225.
  10. Rekha Kumari, Pushpa Srichand. Foetal outcome in patients with meconium stained liquor. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association May 2012;62(5):474-6.

Corresponding Author

Dr Smita Soni

P.G. Student, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,

G.R. Medical College, Gwalior (M.P.), India