Title: Impact of Intensified Campaign on Immunization of under 16 Children During Outbreak of Diphtheria in Manjeri Municipality from June 2016 - October 2016

Authors: Dr Hakkim N, Dr Ajith Kumar V T, Dr Mohandas Nair, Dr Sajini

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i2.11

Abstract

Objectives

  • To assess the impact of intensified campaign during June – October 2016 on immunization coverage of under 16 children of Manjeri Municipality
  • To assess the changes in immunization status of Unimmunized and Partially Immunized under 5 children of different age groups, sex and religion

Methods

Study Design:  Cross sectional

Study Setting:  Manjeri Municipal Area

Study Period:  June 2016 - October 2016

Participants: UI & PI under 16 Children of the area

Sample size: 27690 Children

Data Collectio: Survey by Trained Health staffof PP unit of GMC Manjeri

Large majority of UI/PI children remain unchanged as parents are reluctant to

Statistical Analysis: Using Excel Sheet

Intensified Campaign

Workshop -1,

Seminars -2:

Awareness camps – 3

PTA Meetings- 46

House visits of UI/PI children by ward councilors, doctors politicians & religious leaders

IMMUNIZATION SESSIONS

Outreach - 140

Institution- 52, School -3 using Td vaccine.

Results

  1. Immunization coverage as on 30-06-2016
  • Under 5 children (8341):80.02% [0.19%UI & 18.89%PI]
  • Under 16 children (27690):76.05% [2.77%UI & 21.8%PI]
  1. After the intensified immunization campaign changes observed are
  • PI Children: 0-5 years:9%became fully immunized0-16 years: 18.07%became FI
  • UI Children: 0- 5 years:3.77%became PI0-16 years: 19%became PI

III. Older children (7 – 16) are getting benefitted

With school immunizations schedules with3 sessions 32.8%UI got Td vaccination.

  1. On comparing the immunization status of

0-5 children at two different points of time on 30-06-2016 to and 31-10-2016 results are as follows:

Keywords: diphtheria; immunization; outbreak.

References

  1. Hingson R. Obtaining optimal attendance at mass immunization programs. Health Serv Res 1974; 89:53-64.
  2. Yokan C, D'Onofrio C. Application of health ed- ucation methods to achieve higher immunization rates. Public Health Rep 1978; 93:211-15.
  3. Bussey AL, Holmes BS. Immunization levels: need they all decline? Lancet 1977^:970-1.
  4. Sukhorukova NL, Korzhenkova MP, Sigaeva LA, et al. Data from different Moscow polyclinics on the utilization of vaccination against diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, and measles in children of the first three years of life. (In Russian). Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol 1982;8:112-16
  5. Failure to vaccinate. (Editorial). Lancet 1983; 2:1343-4.
  6. . Friede AM, Waternaux C, Guyer B, et al. An epidemiologies! assessment of immunization programme participation in the Philippines. Int J Epidemiol 1985;14:135-41.
  7. Hand book on immunization for Medical officers’s published by Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India 2008
  8. World health organization (WHO) UNICEF, World Bank. State of the worlds vaccines and immunization,3rd edition. Geneva:WHO 2009.
  9. Immunization coverage, Fact sheet. Reviewed January 2018 www.who.int/entity/mediacentre/factsheets/fs378/en/

Corresponding Author

Dr Ajith Kumar V T

MBBS, MD (Paediatrics), DCH, Professor and Head, Dept of Pediatrics,

Govt. Medical College, Manjeri, Kerala