Title: Treatment Outcome of Triple Negative Breast Cancer- A Retrospective Study from Regional Cancer Centre Kashmir
Authors: Wani Shahid Bashir, Manirathinam Ramalingam, Parray Muzafar Yousuf, Lone Mansoor Ul Haq, Shah Saqib Ahmad, Sofi Mushtaq Ahmad, Malik Tariq Rasool
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i12.151
Abstract
Introduction
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an uncommon subtype of breast cancer which lacks both hormone receptors (Estrogen receptor and Progestrone receptor) as well as Human epidermal growth factor receptor – 2. The lack of these receptors makes its prognosis challenging as neither hormonal therapy nor anti Her-2 targetted therapy serves as a treatment option. As a result TNBC accounts for a disproportionate number of breast cancer deaths, majority studies indicate a negative impact of triple negative phenotype on patient prognosis1,2,3. Importantly the prognostic effect of TNBC is independent of poor grade, nodal status, tumor size and treatment4. The aggressiveness of TNBC is further indicated by the fact that the peak recurrence occurs within the first 3 years after initial treatment of the disease with the majority of deaths occurring in the first 5 years5 and after diagnosis of metastatic disease a significantly shorter survival was observed in TNBC6,7. Conversely the risk for late recurrences i.e. beyond five years of diagnosis is decreased by 50% compared to hormone receptor positive disease8. However differences between TNBC and non-TNBC regarding overall survival wears off at 10 years of follow up.
References
- Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L, et al: The triple negative paradox: Primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res 13::2329,2007-2334.
- Sorlie T1, Tibshirani R, Parker J et al. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.2003 Jul 8;100(14):8418-23.
- Abd El-Rehim DM, Ball G, Pinder SE, et al. High-throughput protein expression analysis using tissue microarray technology of a large well-characterised series identifies biologically distinct classes of breast cancer confirming recent cDNA expression analyses. Int J Cancer2005;116:340–50.
- Hugh J, Hanson J, Cheang MC, et al. Breast cancer subtypes and response to docetaxel in node-positive breast cancer: use of an immunohistochemical definition in the BCIRG 001 Trial, J Clin Oncol , 2009, vol. 27 (pg. 1168-1176).
- Tischkowitz M, Brunet JS, Begin LR et al. Use of immunohistochemical markers can refine prognosis in triple negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer2007; 7; 134.
- Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, et al: Triple-negative breast cancer: Clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 13::4429,2007-4434.
- Harris LN, Broadwater G, Lin NU et al. Molecular subtypes of breast cancer in relation to paclitaxel response and outcomes in women with metastatic disease: results from CALGB 9342. Breast Cancer Res.2006; 8; R66.
- Nofech-Mozes S, Trudeau M, Kahn H, et al. Patterns of recurrence in the basal and non-basal subtypes of triple-negative breast cancers, Breast Cancer Res Treat , 2009, vol. 118 (pg. 131-137).
- Wani Shahid Bashir,Shah Saqib Ahmad, Lone Mansoor et al. Incidence and clinical profile of Triple negative breast cancer in Kashmir.jmscr Volume 05 Issue 04 April 2017:20746-20749.
- Lin NU, Claus E, Sohl J, et al. Sites of distant recurrence and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, Cancer , 2008, vol. 113 (pg. 2638-2645).
- Heitz F, Harter P, Traut A, et al. Cerebral metastases (CM) in breast cancer (BC) with focus on triple-negative tumors, J Clin Oncol (Meeting Abstracts) , 2008, vol. 26 (Abstr 1010).
- Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer, J Clin Oncol , 2008, vol. 26 (pg. 1275-1281).
- Dawood S, Broglio K, Esteva FJ, et al. Survival among women with triple receptor-negative breast cancer and brain metastases, Ann Oncol , 2009, vol. 20 (pg. 621-627).