Title: A Study on Demographic Variables in Patients with Somatoform Disorders Conducted at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Psychosomatic Clinic, Vidarbha
Authors: Ratika Sharma, Prakriti Vohra
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i11.56
Abstract
Introduction: Somatoform disorders cause significant emotional distress for patients and are a challenge to physicians. Somatization disorder appears to be more common in women than men. They have been reported to be more prevalent in rural areas and among the less educated people.
Material and Methods: 270 patients with a diagnosis of any of the sub types of somatoform disorders were inducted from those attending the out-patient and in- patient services of deptt. Of Psychiatry affiliated to AVBRH, a tertiary care hospital, Vidarbha. It was a cross-sectional study carried out from October 2010 to July 2012.
Results: Study showed maximum number of patients of age group of 60 to 80 years (48.88%) followed by 40 to 60 years (27.77%) with mild female preponderance (56.67%). The females had comparatively longer duration of somatoform disorder (4.48 years vs. 3.97 years). In our study, majority of patients with somatization disorder were married (88.9%) followed by widow/widower (7.4%); single (4.1%) and separated (1.9%). Also, majority of patients in our study were Illiterate (20.0%); followed by primary educated (10.0%); secondary educated (40 %) and 30% patients were graduates.
Conclusion: Females of middle age are more commonly affected with somatoform disorders and suffer with significantly longer time period.
Keywords: Demographic variables, education status, somatoform disorders.
References
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. rev. Washington, D.C. American Psychiatric Association, 2000.
- Escobar J.I., Waitzkin H.N., and Silver R.C.,“Abridged somatization: a study in primary care” Psychosom Med. (1998) 60, 466–72.
- Kroenke K., Spitzer R.L.,“Gender differences in the reporting of physical and somatoform symptoms. Psychosom Med” (1998) 60, 150-55.
- Gijsbers van Wijk C.M.T., Kolk A.M., “Sex differences in physical symptoms: the contribution of symptoms perception theory” Soc Sci Med (1997) 45, 231-46.
- Nakao M., Fricchione G., Zuttermeister M.A., Myers P., Barsky A.J., Benson H., et al, “Effects of gender and marital status on somatic symptoms of patients attending a mind/body medicine clinic” Behav Med (2001) 26, 159-68.
- Kroenke K., Spitzer R.L., Williams J.B.W., “The PHQ-15: validity of a new measure for evaluating the severity of somatic symptoms” Psychosom Med (2002) 64, 258–66.
- Klose M., Jacobi F.,“Can gender differ-ences in the prevalence of mental disorders be explained by sociodemographic factors? “Arch Womens Ment Health (2004) 7,133-48.
- Kismayer L.J., Robbins J.M. Current Concepts of Somatization: Research and Clinical Perspectives. Washington: American Psychiatric Press, 1991.
- Fink P., Sorensen L., Engberg M., Holm M., Munk-Jorgensen P.,“Somatization in primary care. Prevalence, health care utilization, and general practitioner recognition” Psychosomatics (1999) 40, 330-38.
- Bishit J., Sankhyan N., Kaushal R.K., Sharma R.C., Grover N.,“Clinical profile of Pediatric Somatoform Disorders” Indian Pediatrics (2008) 45, 111-15.