Title: Bile Duct Injuries Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and their Outcome
Authors: Dr Manawor Ahsan, Dr Mohammad Eqbal Ahmad
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i6.77
Abstract
Introduction: Bile duct injuries are still among the most common and dreadful complications, following laparoscopic cholecystectomies despite advancement of training and technology.
Methods: Prospective study of bile duct injuries occurring in the period 2013 to 2015 at Nalanda Medical College Patna.
Results: in total, 40 patients (28 women and 12 men) with a median age of 45 (range 10–76) Years had a leak or a lesion of the bile ducts during the study period. Total incidence of Postoperative bile leaks or bile duct injuries was 0.9% and for bile duct injuries separately, 0.4%. Median delay from injury to repair was 5 days (range 0–68 days). In 12 patients (18%), the injury was discovered intraoperatively. Bile leak was the major symptom in 59%, and 52% had a leak from the cystic duct or from assumed aberrant ducts in the liver bed of the gall bladder. Following the clavien–dindo classification, 39% and 45% were classified as IIIA and IIIB, respectively, 10% as IV, and 6% as V. in all, 21 patients had injuries to the common bile duct or hepatic ducts, and in these patients, 21% were treated with a hepaticojejunostomy , 70s% had an uncomplicated event, whereas 2.5% later on developed a stricture. Out of 21 patients with injuries to the cystic duct/aberrant ducts, 14 could be treated with stents or sphincterotomies and percutaneous drainage.
Conclusion: half of injuries following cholecystectomies are related to the cystic duct, and most of these can be treated with endoscopic or percutaneous procedures. A considerable number of patients following hepaticojejunostomy will later on develop a stricture.
Keywords: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; bile duct injuries; complications; mortality.
References
1. McKinley SK, Brunt LM, Schwaitzberg SD: Prevention of bile duct injury: The case for incorporating educational theories of expertise. Surg Endosc 2014;28:3385–3391 (PMID: 24939158).
2. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ: An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J m Coll Surg 1995;180(1):101–125 (PMID: 8000648).
3. Waage A, Nilsson M: Iatrogenic bile duct injury: A population-based study of 152 776 cholecystectomies in the wedish Inpatient Registry. Arch Surg 2006;141 (12):1207–1213 (PMID:17178963).
4. Karvonen J, Salminen P, Gronroos JM: Bile duct injuries dur-ing open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the laparoscopicera: Alarming trends. Surg Endosc 2011;25(9):2906–2910 (PMID:21432006).
5. Chuang KI, Corley D, Postlethwaite DA et al: Does increase experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy yield more complex bile duct injuries? Am J Surg 2012;203(4):480–487(PMID: 22326050)
6. Harboe KM, Bardram L: Nationwide quality improvement of cholecystectomy: Results from a national database. Int J Qual Health Care 2011;23(5):565–573 (PMID: 21727152).\
7. Harboe KM, Bardram L: The quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark: Outcome and risk factors for 20,307 patients from the national database. Surg Endosc 2011;25(5):1630–1641 (PMID:21136118).
8. Andersson R, Eriksson K, Blind PJ et al: Iatrogenic bile duct injury—A cost analysis. HPB 2008;10(6):416–419 (PMID:19088927; PMCID: 2597315).
9. Scurr JR, Brigstocke JR, Shields DA et al: Medicolegal claims following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the UK and Ireland. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010;92(4):286–291 (PMID: 20501014;PMCID: 3025217).
10. Holte K, Bardram L, Wettergren A et al: Rekonstruktion af dybe galdevejslesioner efter laparoskopisk kolecystektomi [Reconstruction of major bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy]. Ugeskr Laeg 2010;172(9):705 (PMID: 20402019).
11. Pioche M, Ponchon T: Management of bile duct leaks. J Visc Surg 2013;150(3 Suppl.):S33–158 (PMID: 23791984).
12. Walsh RM, Henderson JM, Vogt DP et al: Long-term outcome of biliary reconstruction for bile duct injuries from laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surgery 2007;142(4):450–456;discussion 456–457 (PMID: 17950335).
13. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA: Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240(2):205–213 (PMID: 15273542; PMCID: 1360123).
14. Strasberg SM: Avoidance of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2002;9(5):543–547 (PMID: 12541037).
15. Eikermann M, Siegel R, Broeders I et al: Prevention and treatment of bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecyste-ctomy: The clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 2012;26 (11): 3003–3039 (PMID: 23052493).
16. Tornqvist B, Stromberg C, Persson G et al: Effect of intended intraoperative cholangiography and early detection of bile duct injuryonsurvival after cholecystectomy: Population based cohort study.BMJ2012;345:e6457 (PMID: 23060654; PMCID: 3469410).
17. Ford JA, Soop M, Du J et al: Systematic review of intraoperative cholangiography in cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2012;99(2):160–167(PMID: 22183717).
18. Ludwig K, Bernhardt J, Steffen H et al: Contribution of intraoperative cholangiography to incidence and outcome of common bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2002;16(7):1098–1104 (PMID: 12165830).
19. Fathy O, Wahab MA, Hamdy E et al: Post-cholecystectomy biliary injuries: One center experience. Hepatogastroenterology 2011;58(107–108):719–724 (PMID: 21830376).
20. Iannelli A, Paineau J, Hamy A et al: Primary versus delayed repair for bile duct injuries sustained during cholecystectomy: Results of a survey of the Association Francaise de Chirurgie. HPB 2013;15(8): 611–616 (PMID: 23458568; PMCID: 3731582).
21. De Reuver PR, Grossmann I, Busch OR et al: Referral pattern and timing of repair are risk factors for complications after reconstructive surgery for bile duct injury. Ann Surg 2007;245(5):763–770(PMID: 17457169; PMCID: 1877064).
22. Bauer TW, Morris JB, Lowenstein A et al: The consequences of a major bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 1998;2(1):61–66 (PMID: 9841969).
23. Varabei A, Arlouski Y, Vizhinis E et al: The use of double balloon enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of strictures of hepaticojejunal anastomoses after primary correction of bile duct injuries. Wideochir Inne Tech Malo Inwazyjne 014;9(2):219–225 (PMID:25097690; PMCID: 4105680).
24. Melton GB, Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL et al: Major bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Effect of surgical repair on quality of life. Ann Surg 2002;235(6):888–895 (PMID: 12035047; PMCID: 1422520).
25. Landman MP, Feurer ID, Moore DE et al: The long-term effect of bile duct injuries on health-related quality of life: A metaanalysis.HPB 2013;15(4):252–259 (PMID: 23458623; PMCID: 3608978).
26. Jablonska B, Olakowski M, Lampe P et al: Quality-of-life assessment in the treatment of iatrogenic bile duct injuries: Hepaticojejunostomy versus end-to-end biliary reconstructions. ANZ J Surg 2012;82(12):923–927 (PMID: 22931473).
27. Baillie J: Endoscopic approach to the patient with bile duct injury. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2013;23(2):461–472 (PMID: 23540970).
28. Pitt HA, Sherman S, Johnson MS et al: Improved outcomes of bile duct injuries in the 21st century. Ann Surg 2013;258(3): 490–499 (PMID: 24022441).