Title: Effectiveness of Repetitive Bilateral Arm Training with Rhythmic Auditory Cueing in Hemiparetic Stroke
Authors: Thota Bindhu Keerthi, Kattela Suneel Kumar, Achyutha Kiran Kumar, Akkarapaka Hemachand
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i5.216
Abstract
Background: Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the United States and the leading cause of adult Disability.1 Annually approximately 7,50,000 suffer a stroke2 Although incidents rates have remained constant over the last 3 decades, mortality has declined, leaving an increased Stroke is the third leading cause of death in number of patients requiring rehabilitation.3 Upper Extremity Hemiperesis is the most common post stroke disability and its recovery is often limited. Chronic Upper Extremity Weakness is the leading cause of functional disability after Stroke.
Methods: In this study we compare the effects of BATRAC [Bilateral arm training with rhythmic Auditory Cueing] with that of conservative unilateral training. In this study we determined the effects of 8 weeks of BATRAC on 15 patients with stroke. 30 minutes daily session 3 times per week was performed with the use of a custom – designed arm training machine.
results: Patients showed significant increases in Fugl-Meyer Upper extremity Motor performance test and Wolf – Motor function test after training than compared to that of conservative unilateral upper extremity training[passive movements]. These benefits are sustained even after 6 weeks of training cessation.
Conclusion: 8 weeks of BATRAC improved functional motor performance of paretic upper extremity as weii as improvements in Range of Motion and Isometric strength
Keywords: Auditory cueing, repetitive Bilateral arm training ,Motor function.
References
1. American Heart Association, Heart and Stroke Facts Dallas, Tex: American Heart Association; 1997.
2. Broderick JP. Practical considerations in the early treatment of Ischemic Stroke. Am Fam Physician 1998; 57:73-80. Medline
3. Barker WH, Mullooly JP. Stroke in a defined elderly population, stroke 1997; 28:740-745.
4. Whitall J, McCombe Waller S, Silver KH, Macko RF. RBATRAC Improves motor function in chronic hemiperatic stroke. Str-oke 2000;31.2390-2395 CrossRef Medline
5. Gowland C, deBruin H, basmajian J, Plews N, Nurcea I. Agonist and Antagonist activity during voluntary upper limb movement in patients with stroke. Phys. Ther. 1992; 72: 624-633.
6. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of Upper Extremity function in stroke patients: the copenhagen study, Arch phys Med. Rehabilitation 1994; 75: 852-857. Cross Ref Medline
7. Olsen TS, Improvement of Function and motor impairment after stroke. J Neural Rehabilitation 1989; 3: 187-192.
8. Stewart KC, Cauraugh JH, Summers JJ. Bilateral movement training and stroke rehabilitation : a systematic review and meta analysis. J Neural Science 2006; 244:89-95.
9. Stoykov ME, Lewis G, Corcos DM. Comparison of bilateral and unilateral training for upper extremity hemiperesis in stroke. Neurorehabil neural repair 2009; 23: 945-953.
10. Volpe BT, Lynch D, Rytuman – Berland A, FerraroM, Galgano M, Hogan N, et al., Intensive sensory motor arm training mediated by therapist or robot improves hemiperesis in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil neural repair 2008; 22:305-310.
11. Chan M, Tong R, Chung K. Bilateral upper limb training with functional electrical stimulation in patients with chronic stroke. Neuro Rehabil. Neural repair 2009; 23: 357-365.
12. Kunkel A, Kopp B, Muller G, Villringer K, Taub E, Flor H, CIMT for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med. Rehabil 1999; 80: 624-628.
13. Wolf S, Lecraw D, Barton L, Jann B. Forced use of hemiplegic extremities to reverse the effect of learned non use among chronic stroke and head injured patients. Exp Neurol. 1989; 104: 125-132.
14. Taub E, Miller N, Novacc T, Cook E, Fleming W, Nepomuceno C, Conell J, Crago J. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch phys Med. Rehabil. 1993; 74:347-354.
15. Kelso JAS, Southard DL, Good man D. On the co-ordination of two handed movements. J. Exp psychol human percept perform. 1979; 5: 229-238.
16. Kelso JAS, Putnam CA, Goodman D. on the space-time structure of human interlimb co-ordination. QJ Exp Psychol. 1983; 35A: 347-375.
17. Lazarus JC, Whitall J, Franks CA. Age difference in Isometric force regulation. J Exp Child. Psychol. 1995; 60: 245-260.
18. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning. 3rd ed. Champaign III. Human kinetics: 1998.
19. Nudo RJ Barbay S, Kleim JA. Role of neuro-plasticity in functional recovery after stroke. In: Grafman J, Levin HS, eds. Cerebral Re-organisation of function after brain injury: Implications for Rehabilitation New York, NY: Oxford University Press: 1999.
20. Thaut MH, Mc Intosh GC, Rice RR, Prassas SG. Effect of Rhythmic Auditory Cueing on EMG and Temporal Stride parameters in hemiparetic gait of stroke patients. J.Neural Rehabil. 1993; 7: 9-16.
21. Locke EA, Bryan JF. Cognitive aspects of psychomotor performance: the effects of performance goals on the level of performance. J Appl Psychol. 1966; 50:286-291.
22. Salmoni AW, Schmidt RA, Walter CB. Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and reappraisal. Psychol Bull: 1984; 95: 355-386.
23. Thaut MH, Mc Intosh GC, Rice RR, Rhythmic facilitation of gait training in hemiparetic stroke rehabilitation. J Neural Sci. 1997; 151: 207-212.