Title: The Study of Clinico-Pathological Condition of Acute Appendicitis In Srikakulam
Authors: Suraj Kumar Patnaik, S.S.N.Moulika, N.Ravi Kiran
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i4.51
Abstract
Object: To study clinical and pathological presentation, management and outcome of appendicitis
Methodology: During 2 years study period. We studied 100 cases of acute appendicitis admitted in Rajiv Gandhi institute of medical & general Hospital srikakulam. out of them 97 case are appendicitis and 3 were other causes A detailed history and through clinical examination was done the diagnosis of Appendicitis was based upon Alvarado Score, Total W.B.C. count and ultrasonography and Histopathological examination.
Results: The study group consisted of 100 patients. Majority (62%) of patients were males and (38%) was Females most, common symptoms were pain in the right iliac fossa 98%, anorexia in 88%, Nausea 87% and Vomiting 83%, Total leucocyte count >10.000 in 50%, of patients, and USG findings of localized adynamic illeus in 88%, and Alvarado Score 7 or> 7 are 90% and Histopathology 89% the overall negative appendicitis of 16.7% in female and 3.8% in Males.
Conclusion: Thus from above findings, it can be concluded early diagnosis and appendicectomy is mandatory for better outcome of the patients. The definitive appendicectomy is the line of management.
Keywords: Appendicitis; Alvarado Score; Ultrasonography;
References
1. Hamilton Bailey’s Emergency Surgeries. 12th Edition.,1995; 438-451.
2. Liu CD, Mcfadden DW, Acute abdomen and appendix, In: Greenfield IJ, etal., eds. Surgery : Scintific Principles and practice. 2nded.Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997: 126-1261.
3. Addis DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV, The epidemiology of appendicits and appendicectomy in the United States, AmJ epidemiol 1990:132:910-925.
4. Schwartz SI, Appendix, In: Schwartz SI, ed, Principles of Surgery, 6th ed. New york: Megraw Hill, 1994:1307-1318.
5. Wilcox RT, TraverSo LW, Have the evaluation and Treatment of acute appendicitis changed withnew technology ?Surg clin North Am1997:77:1355-1317.
6. Ramirez JM, Dews J : Practical Score to a decision making in doubtful cases of acute appendicitis : Br.J.S.,81:680-683,1994.
7. GallindoGallego, Fadrique, Neto, Calleja, Fernandej; evaluation of ultrasonograpy and clinical diagnostic scoring in suspected appendicitis, Br.J.Surg:85:3740:1998.
8. Lewis FR, Holeroft JW, et al: Appendicitis: A critical review of diagnosis and treatment in 1000 cases. Ach Surg 1975; 110: 677-684.
9. Ronan ‘O’ conell, “ the vermiform appendix,” Bailey and Love Short practice of surgery, 24th edition, p.1203-1218.
10. George Mathews John, Siba Prasad Pattanayak, Charan Panda, K. Raja Ram Mohan Rao, Evaluation of Ultrasonography as a Useful Diagnostic Aid in Appendicitis.IJS Vol. 64,No.5, 436-439,2002.
11. Owen TD, William H. Stiff G, Jenk-enson LR, Rees B1: Evaluation of
Alvarado Score in Acute Appendicitis: Journal of social medicine, Vol.85,87-88: 1992.
12. Bhattacharjee Pk, chowdary T, Roy D: Prospective Evaluation of modified Alvarado Score for diagnosis of acute appendicitis : journal of Indian medical Association, vol,100, No. S; May 2002.
13. GallindoGallego, Fadrique, Neto, Calleja, Fernandej; evaluation of ultrasonograpy and clinical diagnostic scoring in suspected appendicitis, Br.J.Surg:85:3740:1998.
14. Owen TD, William H. Stiff G, Jenkenson LR, Rees B1: Evaluation of
Alvarado Score in Acute Appendicitis: Journal of social medicine, Vol. 85,87-88: 1992.
15. Kallan M, Talbot D, Cunliffe WJ, Rich AJ, “Evaluation of modified alvarod Score in diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis : A prospective study “. Ann, RCS of Engl; 76(6): 418-419, 1994.
16. Peiper et al, Actachir Scand, 1982; 148.
17. Elongovan S. Clincial and laboratory findings in acute appendicitis in the elderly, J Am Board Fam Pract 1996: 9: 75-78.
18. Doraiswamy, Br, J. Surg. 1979; 66: 782.
19. Puylaert JBCM: Acute appendicitis-US evaluation using Graded compression, radiology, 158;355-360,1986.
20. Jeffrery RB Jr, Laing FC, Townsend RR. Acute appendicitis: sonagraphic criteria based on 250 cases. Radiology 1988; 167: 327-329.
21. Sudhirkumar Mohanty,Kaushik Si, Evaluation of modified Alvarado score in decreasing negitive appendice-ctomy rate-our experience, IJS,vol.62;no.5;342-343;2000.
22. Korner H, Sondenaa K, Soreide Ja, Andersen E et al : the study of negitive appendicectomy rates in Male and Female : age specific and Sexspecific analysis. World J surg 1997;21:313- 317.