Title: Self-directed E-Learning in Under Graduate Medical Teaching
Author: Preethi M. Shenoy
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i2.24
Abstract
Introduction: E-learning or internet based learning, in various forms, is being implemented as a teaching-learning method and is hypothesized to replace traditional learning methods. In this context, there are questions raised regarding its effectiveness in medical education. The study sought to assess the effectiveness of self-directed e-learning against traditional lecture among first year medical students.
Materials and Methods: A quasi-experimental study in which three groups of first year medical students were provided with either didactic lecture, self-directed e-learning or both was followed by a post-test in an objective format.
Result: Based on the score of the post-test, the students who attended an exclusive traditional didactic lecture, performed better than those students who followed the self-directed e-learning method. The result of the study is in contrast to previous studies which support e- learning. The reasons could be due to the difference in target population, post-test tool and the domain assessed.
Conclusions: We can hence conclude that e-learning as a method of learning cannot be implemented as a stand-alone method, across the student population, rather it can be used as a blended learning tool.
Keywords- Effectiveness, self-directed e-learning, traditional didactic lecture.
References
1. Definition of learning in English: Available at: https://en.oxforddictionari-es.com/definition/learning
2. Definition of e-learning in English: Available at: https://en.oxforddiction-aries.com/definition/e-learning
3. University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Office of Integrated Medical Education. E-Learning Resources at the Faculty of Medicine. Available at: http://oime.utor-onto.ca/Faculty/E-Learning_Resources.htm (accessed 11/01/2017).
4. Masic I. E-Learning as New Method of Medical Education. Acta Inform Med. 2008;16 (2):102–17.
5. Moazami F, Bahrampour E, Azar MR, Jahedi F and Moattari M. Comparing two methods of education (virtual versus traditional) on learning of Iranian dental students: a post-test only design study. BMC Medical Education. 2014;14( 45)
6. Święczkowska H, Trzęsicki K, Surowik D, Doliwa K, editors. Logic, philosophy and computer science - series: studies in logic, grammar and rhetoric. 1st ed. Poland; 2010. p (159-165)
7. Gruner D, Pottie K, Archibald D, Allison J, Sabourin V, Belcaid I, McCarthy A, Brindamour M, Polec LA, Duke P. Introducing global health into the undergraduate medical school curriculum using an e-learning program: a mixed method pilot study. BMC Medical Education. 2015;15( 142)
8. Feng J-Y, ChangY-T, Chang H-Y, Erdley WS, Lin C-H, Chang Y-J. Systematic Review of Effectiveness of Situated E-Learning on Medical and Nursing Education. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 2013;10(3):174–183
9. Woo MA, Kimmick JV. Comparison of internet versus lecture instructional methods for teaching nursing research. J Prof Nurs.. 2000;16(3):132–9.
10. Curran VR, Hoekman T, Gulliver W, Landells I, Hatcher L. Web-based continuing medical education. (II): Evaluation study of computer-mediated continuing medical education. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2000;Spring;20(2):106-19.
11. Perryer G, Walmsley AD, Barclay CW, Shaw L, Smith AJ. Development and evaluation of a stand-alone web-based CAL program. A case study. Eur J Dent Educ. 2000 ;4(3):118-123.