Title: A Study of Incidence of Various Etiology for Appendicitis in Emergency Appendicectomy by Laproscopic Method
Authors: Dr Ravichandran K, Dr K.C.M. Rajkumar
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i1.139
Abstract
Background: Appendicitis is one of the most common cause of acute abdomen. laparoscopic appendicectomy performed as emergency procedure in many centres as changing trends.
Aims: To study the various outcome of findings in cases with acute appendicitis performed within 24 hours by laparoscopic methods.
Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective hospital based study.50- symptomatic patients diagnosed as acute appendicitis and findings were observed by laparoscopic appendicectomy.
Results: laparoscopic appendicectomy done as emergency procedure (within 24 hours) revealed different pathological findings 46(92%)out of 50 patients,presented with acute appendicitis.
Conclusion: laparoscopic appendicectomy as an emergency procedure revealed appendicular pathology responsible for symptoms.
Keywords: Faecolith, Appendicular mass, Worms, Carcinoma Caecum.
References
1. 1. Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy. 1983;15:59–64. [PubMed]
2. Majeed AW, Troy G, Nicholl JP, et al. Randomized, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small- incision cholecystectomy. Lancet. 1996; 347:989–994. [PubMed]
3. McBurney C. The incision made in the abdominal wall in case of appendicitis with a description of a new method of operating. Ann Surg. 1894;20–38. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg. 2004; 239:43–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Attwood SE, Hill AD, Murphy PG, et al. A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery. 1992;112:497–501. [PubMed]
6. Cox MR, McCall JL, Toouli J, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men. World J Surg. 1996;20:263–266. [PubMed]
7. Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg. 1994;219:725–728. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appende-ctomy: prospective randomized trial. World J Surg. 1996;20:17–20. [PubMed]
9. Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A. Cost-effective appendectomy: open or laparoscopic? a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:1204–1208. [PubMed]
10. Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Kullman E, et al. Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicect-omy. Br J Surg. 1999;86:48–53. [PubMed]
11. Ignacio RC, Burke R, Spencer D, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:334–337. [PubMed]
12. Kazemier G, De Zeeuw GR, Lange JF, et al. Laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:336–340. [PubMed]
13. Klingler A, Henle KP, Beller S, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy does not change the incidence of postoperative infectious complications. Am J Surg. 1998;175:232–235. [PubMed]
14. Kum CK, Ngoi SS, Goh PM, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomy. Br JSurg. 1993;80:1599–1600. [PubMed]
15. Laine S, Rantala A, Gullichsen R, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy: is it worth-while? a prospective, randomized study in young women. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:95–97. [PubMed]
16. Larsson PG, Henriksson G, Olsson M, et al. Laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomies and improves diagnosis in fertile women: a randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:200–202. [PubMed]
17. Long KH, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP, et al. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Interest Group: a prospective randomized compa-rison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses. Surgery. 2001;129: 390– 400. [PubMed].